PopEntertainment.com

It's all the entertainment you need!

 

FEATURE STORIES MOVIE REVIEWS MUSIC REVIEWS BOX SET REVIEWS TV SHOWS ON DVD CONTESTS CONCERT PHOTOS

 

  FEATURE STORIES
  INTERVIEWS A TO E
  INTERVIEWS F TO J
  INTERVIEWS K TO O
  INTERVIEWS P TO T
  INTERVIEWS U TO Z
  INTERVIEWS ACTORS
  INTERVIEWS ACTRESSES
  INTERVIEWS BOOKS
  INTERVIEWS DIRECTORS AND SCREENWRITERS
  INTERVIEWS MUSIC
  INTERVIEWS OSCAR NOMINEES
  INTERVIEWS THEATER
  IN MEMORIAM
  REVIEWS
  MOVIE REVIEWS
  MUSIC REVIEWS
  CONCERT REVIEWS
  BOX SET REPORT CARD
  TV SHOWS ON DVD
  MISCELLANEOUS STUFF & NONSENSE
  CONCERT PHOTOGRAPHY
  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
  CONTESTS
  LINKS
  MASTHEAD
  EMAIL US

"WILD YEARS-THE MUSIC & MYTH OF TOM WAITS" BY JAY S. JACOBS

AVAILABLE IN BOOK STORES EVERYWHERE!

 

PopEntertainment.com > Reviews > Movie Reviews > The General's Daughter

MOVIE REVIEWS

THE GENERAL'S DAUGHTER   (1999)

Starring John Travolta, Madeleine Stowe, Timothy Hutton, James Cromwell, Leslie Stefanson, Clarence Williams III, James Woods, Daniel van Bargen and Peter Weirter.

 

Screenplay by Christopher Bertolini.

 

Directed by Simon West.

 

Distributed by Paramount Pictures.  121 minutes.   Rated R.

The General’s Daughter

The General’s Daughter is a strange, schizophrenic little picture.  That’s not to say bad -- in many ways it is quite good.  However, lurking below a series of terrific performances and interesting moral dilemmas is a lurid little current that overturns the whole enterprise. 

 

Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m no prude and I do believe sleaziness has its place in filmmaking.  But this is so at odds with the rest of the film that the whole story suffers.  It doesn’t even really make sense.  All the information given just turns the title character into an inscrutable mystery, thus blunting the effect of her murder.  Sure, she experienced a horrible trauma, but the way she reacts to it is disturbed and disturbing. 

 

This is only one of several curious logic gaps in the story.  For example, why do the characters played by John Travolta and Madeleine Stowe (both of whom are terrific, by the way) act as if they’ve never met for several scenes before matter-of-factly acknowledging they were former lovers?  Why did they have to be former lovers anyway?  They didn’t get back together, just did some harmless flirting. Why not just have two strangers do that?  Does it give Travolta more of a stake in protecting her?  I guess, but wouldn’t he feel that for any partner? 

 

Also, the mystery is impossible to solve because the murderer showed no predilection towards killing, and as far as we know, he had no contact with the victim.  When he finally is revealed and tries to kill himself and Stowe, it is so at odds with everything you’ve seen before about him that it doesn’t quite work.  Sure, you’re allowed to come up with a trick ending -- but any first year writing student knows you have to at least lay the groundwork for the surprise, so the audience doesn’t feel cheated.  It seems almost like they picked a solution out of a hat. 

 

Too bad.  This film was well made and raises some interesting questions, but in the end it just spends too much time in the gutter.  (7/99)

 

Jay S. Jacobs

RETURN TO MOVIE REVIEWS MENU

Rakuten Affiliate Network Welcome Program

Copyright 1999. PopEntertainment.com All rights reserved.
Revised: January 10, 2016.

dmindbanner.gif (10017 bytes)